From rich@richstowell.com Fri Jan 11 02:18:40 2002
Path: cygnus.com!enews.sgi.com!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.xtra.co.nz!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: rich@richstowell.com (Rich Stowell)
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student
Subject: Re: The Ball & Coordinated Flight
Date: 10 Jan 2002 09:26:51 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 123
Message-ID: <77e002cf.0201100926.702f0593@posting.google.com>
References: <c3f3d247.0201081255.28f4e3de@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.71.243.178
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1010683611 21710 127.0.0.1 (10 Jan 2002 17:26:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jan 2002 17:26:51 GMT
Xref: cygnus.com rec.aviation.student:199717

With all the recent postings about the Slip/Skid Ball, I'm surprised
no one has yet asked the following interesting question:

------------------------------------------------------------------
Is "coordinated flight" always the same as "ball centered" flight?
------------------------------------------------------------------

The answer is NO! The ball is an instrument, and as such, it suffers
from the same three-letter word that all instruments suffer from --
LAG.

As an instrument, the ball is least accurate while you are in the
process of making dynamic changes/control inputs. The ball is most
accurate "after the fact" -- when you are near a steady flight
condition. The ball then allows you to fine tune your yaw control.

A good demonstration of the inherent lag in the ball is a simple
coordination exercise (called a Dutch Roll by aerobatic pilots--has
nothing to do with the Dutch Roll instability of swept wing aircraft,
though):

Looking outside over the nose, and while keeping the nose on a point,
smoothly apply aileron and rudder at the same time, in the same
direction, and roll to say thirty degrees of bank. Then immediately
switch your control inputs to the right--right aileron and right
rudder--to an equal bank angle to the right. Then switch again.

Continue rocking the wings left and right in this coordinated manner
(just like you should be doing any time you're banking, be it into or
out of turns).

The biggest problems in this exercise--pilots usually don't apply
enough aileron and often too much rudder. Also, the rudder input must
exactly coincide with the aileron input. Not before, not after, but
timed with the aileron.

Most non-aerobatic instructors who try to teach this exercise often do
so as a cross-controlled maneuver, to what benefit I don't know. This
should be a coordinated maneuver (as evidenced by the feel in the seat
of the pants and the nose of the airplane staying on a point on the
horizon).

If you try doing this exercise by looking at the ball and trying to
keep it centered, the nose of the airplane will slew all over the sky
and everyone in the airplane will get sick in a hurry.

Another classic demonstration of limitations in the ball was done by
William "Bill" Kershner. He placed two slip/skid balls on the
instrument panel, one each in front of the two seats of a Cessna 150
Aerobat, and one if front of each seat in a Beech Aerobatic Sport. He
then proceeded to do some spins.

The two balls in each airplane were in opposite corners of the
inclinometer--one to the left side, one to the right side. This is why
during a spin, the ball cannot be used to determine which rudder to
step on for recovery.

As a variation of this, I routinely perform the classic skidded
base-to-final turn into a spin (at altitude of course). As part of the
demonstration, I often have the student look at the ball when I feel
we are 1/2 second from spin entry. The ball actually straddles one of
the two lines that we use to know where "centered" is.

In other words, even though we are within 1/2 second of spin departure
in the skidded turn, the ball is only 1/2 ball out of center. It
clearly is not indicating how close we truly are to the impending spin
departure.

In fact, if we couple that left skidded turn into a spin with
Kershner's experiment, we can imagine that prior to spin departure
from a left skidding turn, both balls--the one in front of the pilot
in the left seat, and the one in front of the pilot in the right
seat--are off to the right of center somewhere.

But as we get closer and closer to spin departure, the ball that will
eventually be on the left side of the inclinometer in the left spin
begins to move from the right to the left. Suppose it is just this
ball that you have in your airplane. And even though you are skidding
to the left, the ball eventually begins to move from right to left as
you approach spin departure. At T-minus 1/4 second from spin entry you
glance at this ball. Lo and behold, it's centered! Not really, it's
just en route to the left as the airplane enters the spin. It just so
happens that when you looked at it, things were apparently "lookin'
good!" from a ball standpoint.

An obvious demonstration of another one of the ball's inherent
deficiencies is to roll the airplane to 180 degrees of bank--inverted
flight--and see if the ball will stay on what is now the top of the
hump of the inclinometer while you are in coordinated inverted flight.
The ball cannot stay on the hump, and falls off to the side (though
there is an air bubble that lives in the inclinometer--usually you
can't see it in upright flight, but it makes itself known when
inverted. One could, if one were so "inclined," look to see if the air
bubble is centered to confirm coordinated flight!).

The best advice I was ever given about the ball -- stop staring at it!
(Unless you are in IMC, that is, where we must rely on our
instruments. BTW, when we are in IMC, we do everything we can to keep
the airplane as close to wings level, steady flight as possible so
that our instruments will give us as close to real time information as
possible--quite a bit different from VFR flying...)

Fly the airplane and control yaw by sight (look at where the nose is
going vs. where it should be), sound (propellers on Cessnas groan when
you are uncoordinated), feel (in the seat of your pants), and
aeronautical knowledge (climbing flight requires some right rudder,
descending flight requires some left rudder, slow flight requires some
right rudder, etc. -- we know this intellectually based on the
aerodynamics of flight in light airplanes).

Use the ball only to confirm and/or fine tune what you are already
doing in terms of yaw control based on sight, sound, feel, and
aeronautical knowledge. Oh, and to sense yaw accurately, you must not
be leaning all over the place in your seat while you are maneuvering.
You must learn to keep your body aligned with the airplane, NOT the
horizon outside. If you are always leaning in your seat to stay
"vertical" to the horizon, your body will not be aligned with the
airplane's yaw axis and it will be much more difficult to sense yaw.

Be safe,

Rich Stowell
http://www.richstowell.com


